Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Communications in Humanities Research
Vol. 1, 21 December 2021
Open
Access | Article
Chinese Reception of Magic Lantern During the Late Qing Dynasty: Study of the Name Change from Huandeng to Yingxi
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper illustrates the changing of Magic Lantern’s Chinese name after its landing in China. Magic Lantern, as an ancient precursor of the modern cinema, experienced a long-term development that plays an increasingly important role in our modern life. The change of its Chinese name shows the Chinese perception of this apparatus. People neglected the alternative paths of “cinema” when the cinema becoming into an entertainment stereotype for the public. This paper will look back to the beginning of the perception history of this apparatus, rethink the history writing method, and try to discover an alternative approach to understand cinema.
Keywords
early cinema, media archaeology, magic lantern
References
1. Rossell, Deac (2005). The Magic Lantern and Moving Images before 1800. Barockberichte (Salzburg), 40-41, pp686-693.
2. Crary, Jonathan. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the 19th Century. New edition edition. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1992. pp77
3. Natale, Simone. "Understanding Media Archaeology". Canadian Journal of Communication, vol. 37 (2012), pp 523–527. [1]
4. Terry Borton & Debbie Borton. Before the Movies: American Magic Lantern Entertainment and the Nation's First Great Screen Artist, Joseph Boggs Beale. John Libbey Publishing, 2015.
5. Zheng, Kuangmin. The Japanese Theory Background of Liang Qichao. Shanghai Book Store Press, 2003
6. Sun Qing. Magic Lantern: the projection, production and dissemination of early Chinese slides in the 18th-20th century [J]. Research on modern history, 2018 (04): 65-83 + 160-161
7. Tang Hongfeng. Vision, modernity and Media Archaeology: the boundary and logic of visual culture research [J]. Academic research, 2020 (06): 36-43 + 177
8. Li, Suyuan. ‘The film Theory of China Early Cinema’. Modern Film, 25 April 1994.
9. Fan Pen Chen (2003), Shadow Theaters of the World, Asian Folklore Studies, Vol. 62, No. 1 (2003), pp. 25-64
10. 'Shadow Play’, n.d. http://www.visitourchina.com/guide/culture/shadow-plays.html.
11. Chinavista. "Chinavista.com." The Shadow show. Retrieved on 2007-05-26.
12. Grace, Kingsley. ‘“Film Impresario of Orient” and “Too Much Magic”’, n.d
13. Irene Suk, Mei Wong. ‘Euro-American Artefacts as Asian Heritage: Lantern Slides of the China Inland Mission as Hong Kong Baptist University Library’. A Million Picture, September 2017. pp32
14. Zheng, Kuangmin. The Japanese Theory Background of Liang Qichao. Shanghai Book Store Press, 2003.
15. Deac, Rossell. ‘The Magic Lantern’, 2002. pp1
16. Jay, Leyda. ‘An Account of Films and the Film Audience in China’. In Dianying/ Electric Shadow, 8–9. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1972.
17. 'Weichun Yuan Guan Yingxi Ji’ (Viewing Shadow plays at the Weichun Garden)’. Xinwenbao, 11 June 1897.
18. Prince, Stephen (2010). "Through the Looking Glass: Philosophical Toys and Digital Visual Effects" (PDF). Projections. Berghahn Journals. 4 (2).
19. Sa, Duer. A History of Film. Chinese Film Press, 1983. pp247-255
20. Tian Feng. Dissemination of Western optical knowledge in China (1853-1902) [D]. Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2016
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).
- Volume Title
- Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2021), Part 2
- ISBN (Print)
- 978-1-915371-02-7
- ISBN (Online)
- 978-1-915371-03-4
- Published Date
- 21 December 2021
- Series
- Communications in Humanities Research
- ISSN (Print)
- 2753-7064
- ISSN (Online)
- 2753-7072
- DOI
- 10.54254/2753-7064/1/ICEIPI_216
- Copyright
- © 2023 The Author(s)
- Open Access
- This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited