Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 21, 07 December 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The current review aims to investigate the differences between the views of face in China and Western countries in the theoretical and practical aspects and demonstrate external manifestations of cross-cultural conflict. The study started by bringing in theories about ‘face’, involved comparing views from different researchers, and listed out some specific daily activities to illustrate how the face issue works in diverse countries. Significant differences were discovered in the views of ‘face’ in various cultures, and the gap was found to be more obvious in the activities in people’s daily lives than in theories, which leads people to treat things and act differently. Although more research is needed to identify the differences in nature and birth of theories, findings suggest a need to pay attention to these differences and how to use them to show respect for people from China or other Western countries in intercultural communication.
face, China, west, lian, mianzi
1. Liu Yuting. “The difference between Chinese and Western sub-views: Take the movie “Wedding Banquet” as an example.” Overseas English .13(2019):186-187. Qi, Xiaoying. “Face: A Chinese concept in a global sociology.” Journal of Sociology 47.3 (2011): 279-295.
2. Qi, Xiaoying. “Face: A Chinese concept in a global sociology.” Journal of Sociology 47.3 (2011): 279-295.
3. Ho, David Yau-fai. “On the concept of face.” American journal of sociology 81.4 (1976): 867-884.
4. Goffman, Erving. “Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior.” (2017).
5. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Vol. 4. Cambridge university press, 1987.
6. Kim, Young Yun, and William B. Gudykunst. Theories in intercultural communication. Vol. 12. Sage Publications, Inc., 2111 West Hillcrest Dr., Newbury Park, CA 91320; Speech Communication Association, 5105 Backlick Rd., Building E, Annandale, VA 22003, 1988.
7. Liang Shuming. Essentials of Chinese Culture [M] Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, May 2005.
8. Written by Lin Yutang/Translated by Huang Jiade. My Country and My People [M] Hunan Literature and Art Publishing House, 2018.
9. Lu Xun’s Essays on Jieting [M] Shenyang: Wanjuan Publishing Company, October 2014.
10. Huang Guangguo, Hu Xianjin, et al. “Favor and Face: Power Game of Chinese” [M] Beijing: Renmin University of China Press, November 2010.
11. Zhou, Ling, and Shao-jie Zhang. “How face as a system of value-constructs operates through the interplay of mianzi and lian in Chinese: a corpus-based study.” Language Sciences 64 (2017): 152-166.
12. Oetzel, John, et al. “Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States.” Communication monographs 68.3 (2001): 235-258.
13. Chen, Rong. “Responding to compliments A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers.” Journal of pragmatics 20.1 (1993): 49-75.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).